Larger, Heavier Trucks Could Make Roadways More Dangerous

Larger, Heavier Trucks Could Make Roadways More Dangerous

According to the United States Department of Transportation, larger, heavier trucks are associated with a higher risk for serious large truck accidents than smaller, single trailer trucks. Not surprisingly, law enforcement officials, safety leaders, elected officials and even individual truck drivers themselves agree. In fact, a recent poll reveals that an alarming 95 percent of law enforcement officers who were surveyed feel that longer, heavier trucks will be more dangerous. Additionally, an estimated 88 percent of individual truckers who were asked believe that the increased use of larger trucks will negatively impact the safety of America’s roadways.

Large Truck Weight Limits

Large truck weight regulations have been the topic for debate for decades, and in September of 2015, the Safe, Flexible and Efficient Trucking Act was introduced to the House. Fortunately, the amendment that would have raised large truck weight limits to an alarming 91,000 pounds was rejected. Because heavier trucks are more difficult to steer, can become top-heavy and more prone to rollovers, and take a longer distance to stop, the added weight could have posed significant dangers to everyone on the road. Additionally, the heavier trucks would have caused more damage to the roads than the typical 80,000 pound trucks do, causing poor infrastructure that would endanger the lives of motor vehicle operators and their passengers. Sadly, in an effort to transport an increased amount of cargo, many trucks continue to be overloaded, exceeding the federal weight regulations.

Extending the Length of Twin-Trailers

The weight of large trucks isn’t the only issue at hand, however. The Coalition for Efficient & Responsible Trucking (CERT) supported a proposal to increase the maximum length of twin-trailer semi-trucks last year as well. Current regulations allow double-trailer rigs to have trailers that are a maximum of 28 feet long. Advocates aimed at increasing that length to 33 feet to increase the amount of cargo that truck drivers could transport in a single trip. While it is true that the legislation would have likely resulted in fewer trucks being on the nation’s roads, the dangers associated with the longer trucks significantly outweighed the benefits of less congestion.

Smaller cars and pedestrians can already be difficult for truckers to see, and longer trailers would only make that worse. Passing and merging would become more difficult, and the added trailer length would cause these trucks to have a 22-foot longer stopping distance. Fortunately, the language to lengthen twin-trailers was not approved.

Tennessee Voted the Best State to Own a Trucking Business Because of Lenient Regulations

Tennessee Voted the Best State to Own a Trucking Business Because of Lenient Regulations

Recently, Tennessee was named the best state to own a small trucking company, in part because of its lenient trucking regulations. While federal regulations dictate certain requirements for trucking companies, regulations differ from state to state.

Tennessee Trucking Law

The recent survey that placed Tennessee at the top of the list for best states to own a small trucking business considered several factors, along with regulations, including friendliness to truck drivers and overnight parking fees. Favorable regulations, however are a big reason that truckers flock to Tennessee.

State law regulates much of the trucking industry. For example, no commercial vehicle may weigh more than 80,000 pounds. Trucks may also be no taller than 13 feet, six inches and no wider than 8 feet.

Tennessee law also regulates commercial driver license issuance. Trucking companies must ensure that each of their drivers has a current commercial driver license, along with a valid medical card.

In comparison with regulations in other states, Tennessee’s laws are fairly lax. In California, for example, certain laws that cap emissions and limit driving hours are pushing trucking companies toward states like Tennessee. Carriers in California are required to givea paid 30-minute meal break for every five hours on the clock and a paid 10-minute break for every four hours behind the wheel.

Though Tennessee law accounts for many trucking regulations, federal trucking industry rules trump local requirements, when a conflict arises. These federal laws regulate interstate trucking and determine things like the amount of hours that a trucker can drive before resting and which records must be kept.

Any truck driver or trucking company that violates either Tennessee or federal law may be found liable for any injuries or deaths that they are responsible for.

Truck Accidents and Liability

When a truck driver or the company that they work for does not comply with state or federal regulations, they could be found liable if an accident occurs. In Tennessee, a crash victim must prove that a defendant breached a legal duty for them to be found negligent. Once a victim determines that a driver or company’s negligence caused his or her injuries, they may be eligible to receive compensation. Victims may consult with semi truck accident attorneys to determine if filing a lawsuit is warranted, and if a driver or trucking company violated state or federal trucking laws.

Congressional Oversight Of Trucking Industry Under Scrutiny

Congressional Oversight Of Trucking Industry Under Scrutiny

The Department of Transportation (DoT) budget is at the center of a storm of criticism in Washington, DC. The bill provides necessary funding to the DoT, but includes problematic language that eases restrictions on the hours of service for truck drivers, according to a Nashville truck accident attorney. Debate over trucking industry regulations is nothing new; however, a steady rise in serious accidents and fatalities involving trucks make this debate more visible.

Role Of The Federal Government

Regulation of interstate commerce is one of the enumerated, or defined powers in the Constitution. The federal government has the right to pass and enforce laws that involve trade across state lines; otherwise there would be hundreds of different trade laws in the country.

Since 1966, regulation of the trucking industry has been the responsibility of the Department of Transportation, and its newer sub-cabinet department, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). These two bodies perform periodic inspection of trucking companies and enforce the safety regulations established by Congress. Congress also plays a role by allocating the DoT budget each year.

Failure to agree on the FY 2017 budget is the result of five important disagreements.

Speed Limiters

Nashville truck accident attorney knows that speed is commonly the reason why a fender bender becomes a serious accident. The Senate wants the DoT to mandate speed limiters on all heavy trucks. The limiters would reduce the maximum speed for semi trucks, and include huge fines for drivers or carriers who try to get around the regulations. The limiters will lower the accident rate, but their installation will cost owner-operators and small trucking companies thousands of dollars, costs which will be passed to consumers.

Hours Of Service

The most hotly contested regulations of the trucking industry are the federal hours of service guidelines. In general, the rules state that drivers cannot work more than 14 consecutive hours without a 10 hour rest period, and they cannot drive more than 11 hours in that period. Drivers are also limited to 60 hours in a week. Safety organizations argue the hours of service guidelines keep fatigued drivers off the road, while drivers and trucking companies argue that forcing drivers to take mandatory break periods limits their ability to earn a living. The current push is to raise the hours of service limit to 82 hours, with the elimination of the restart period.

Restart Period

Long-haul truck drivers spend weeks on the road at a time, and a Nashville truck accident attorney knows that the longer the driver stays on the road, the greater the chance of an accident. The restart provisions were designed to force long-haul drivers to take an extended 34 hour break to “restart” their weekly driving clock. Lobbyists want the restart period removed from DoT guidelines in order to encourage drivers to keep moving every day.

Truck Size And Weight

Often overlooked by the public, the discussions about the size and weight of trucks have very real consequences for public safety. The federal weight limit is 80,000 pounds, with a limit of 28 feet per trailer. The trucking industry wants to increase the weight to 88,000 pounds, and increase the length of trucks to 33 feet. The changes would allow a single truck to more than double its carrying capacity, but the increased weight and length would make the ability to stop even harder.

Driving Age

Because trucks moving across state lines are under the jurisdiction of the DoT, the federal government sets the driving age for commercial trucks. In November 2015, the House passed a bill that lowered the driving age for interstate carriers from 21 to 18. At the state level, the commercial driving age has been 18 for several years, but the federal restriction pushed many potential drivers away from lucrative long-haul jobs. Trucking companies are facing a severe shortage of long-haul drivers, and they believe lowering the age will fill the gap. Opponents point to CDC data that shows drivers in their late teens have a disproportionate number of accidents and fatalities, often due to inexperience and immaturity. Placing younger drivers behind the wheel of a semi as a long-haul driver would greatly increase the risk of highway fatalities.

Beginning in mid-2015, Congress considered a series of measures that rolled back or eliminated safety measures in the trucking industry. The industry’s lobbyists claim the changes were necessary because of work shortages and increased pressure to make deliveries on time. Opponents of the new rules, from victims groups to state lawmakers, down to a Nashville truck accident attorney, believe the changes unfairly put the public at risk.

The debate in Congress is on hold until the members return in mid-May. When they do, almost every Nashville truck accident attorney expects some loosening of truck driving regulations, and more accidents.

New Law Requires Truckers to Keep Electronic Logs

New Law Requires Truckers to Keep Electronic Logs

In December of 2015, a new law was put into place that will change the way truckers log drive time and rest breaks. The rule, which requires truckers to use an electronic logging system, is expected to save an estimated 26 lives and prevent approximately 562 serious injuries caused by large trucks each year. Although truckers have been required to maintain paper logs that keep track of drivers’ rest breaks and hours on the road since the 1930s, these types of logs are easily tampered with and a significant number of serious and fatal large truck accidents still occur due to driver fatigue.

Since the required technology, referred to as an Electronic Logging Device (ELD) is expected to affect about 3 million large truck and bus drivers on America’s roadways, it is imperative that the trucking industry is well informed about the facts surrounding ELDs.

What Truckers Should Know About ELDs

An electronic logging device uses tamper-proof technology to strengthen truck drivers’ compliance with regulations regarding hours of service and required rest breaks in order to help prevent truck accidents caused by driver fatigue. Commercial drivers who are currently required to maintain a Record of Duty Status have until December of 2017 to begin using electronic logging devices to record their hours behind the wheel. There are a variety of technical and performance specifications that the ELDs must feature, but those who have already begun using ELDs that do not meet the new requirements will be “grandfathered in”, and will have until December 2019 to comply with the new regulations.

While there is some debate throughout the trucking industry regarding the pros and cons surrounding electronic logging devices, large truck accident lawyers in Tennessee know that the true benefits brought forth by the technology are undeniable.

  • ELDs will make it easier for roadside safety inspectors to identify Hours of Service (HOS) violations that put lives at risk.
  • According to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), the use of ELDs will save each trucker an estimated $705 per year in paperwork costs alone.
  • Recent research indicates that drivers who used ELDs saw a significant reduction in total crash rate (11.7%) when compared with truckers who used paper logs.

According to Scott Darling, FMCSA Acting Administrator, “Employing technology to ensure that commercial drivers comply with federal hours-of-service rules will prevent crashes and save lives.”

Proposed Law Aims to Keep Truckers out of the Fast Lane

Proposed Law Aims to Keep Truckers out of the Fast Lane

Drivers frequently find themselves slamming on the breaks to avoid hitting a car or truck that is driving slowly in the left lane. One slow-moving vehicle can back up traffic, frustrating other drivers and increasing their accident risks. A proposed Tennessee law aims to end this dilemma.

The media has dubbed this legislation the “Slowpoke Law.” It’s designed to promote highway safety, reduce highway congestion and ease overall driver frustration. The law would require vehicles to stay in the two right lanes on a three lane highway, only using the left lane to pass. This would encourage drivers to stay to the right, even if they are driving at the speed limit.

The Limits of the Passing Lane Law

The bill does not address speeding or speed limits, but rather tackles flow-of-traffic issues. The theory behind the bill is that, while speeding is dangerous, blocking the flow of traffic on the highway is also hazardous. Highway accidents are particularly threatening, especially when large vehicles, such as trucks, are involved.

Law enforcement would have the ability to impose a $50 fine on anyone who violates this law. In certain conditions, such as inclement weather, the law would not apply. This would also be true when a vehicle is merging, or when traffic control devices make driving in the lane a necessity. The law would also not apply to two lane divided highways, though future legislation might address this issue.

The Precedent

Tennessee is the 29th state to propose such legislation. Lawmakers and attorneys realize that the discretion to enforce these laws will be, in part, up to law enforcement officers, however, other states that have adopted such measures are citing success. The bill has received bi-partisan support and is expected to pass.

Fatalities caused by large truck collisions are on the rise in Tennessee. Truck collisions in the state were responsible for 107 deaths in 2012, up from 86 in 2009. Drivers are urged to keep a safe distance while driving around trucks and to pass with care. Laws like these are crafted to reduce the risk for drivers sharing the road with large vehicles. A Tennesseetruck accident attorney can provide more information on traffic laws and the process for seeking compensation after an accident.

E logs: Are They More Effective, and Do They Violate the 4th Amendment

E logs: Are They More Effective, and Do They Violate the 4th Amendment

Semi truck accident attorneys see lots of accidents where truckers are fatigued or have logged too many hours. E-logs are supposed to remedy this situation. Many trucks must have an e-log device in the next two years, but over 10,000 independent truckers are challenging that ruling in court. They claim that the e-logs are are a violation of privacy and constitute unlawful tracking.

E-log books electronically log a trucker’s hours and location. They don’t monitor changes in duty, however. Truckers must record the changes from rest periods to driving manually, which raises the question of whether or not e-logs are truly more accurate than paper ones.

The other point of contention comes from the fact that these devices will be monitoringtruckers‘ movements and location while they are on the job. While this may seem safer, and make it easier to know where truckers are, some independent truckers claim that it is illegal tracking.

One survey shows the impact this law could have on the trucking industry. 15% of truckers are already using electronic logs or will purchase them in the near future. Another 32% said they will wait until they are sure the law will stick before purchasing an electronic log. The law only affects trucks made after the year 2000. 10% of truckers say that they won’t change anything because they drive a truck made before 2000. Another 6% say that they run short haul so the law won’t apply to them. 23% say that they will quit the trucking industry before the regulations take effect, and another 10% claim they will quit if they can’t find a truck made before 2000.

One interesting argument from truckers is that this will force drivers to drive when they have the “legal hours” to do so. While a trucker with a paper log book may decide to make up time after resting, they claim the electronic log book will put a stop to that. While this sounds more safe, if the driver was up most of his rest period for a personal reason or very sick, they will be tempted to drive whether they feel well or not.

The fourth amendment means that a person can’t be stopped or even monitored without probable suspicion of illegal activity. Independent truckers say that these electronic log books are a way of monitoring drivers for law enforcement purposes, and the only way to do that legally is with a warrant.Categories